Close-up of soy beans, showcasing a key genetically modified crop.
Close-up of soy beans, showcasing a key genetically modified crop.

How GM Foods Are Made: A Comprehensive Guide to Genetic Modification

Genetically modified (GM) foods, also known as genetically engineered or biotech foods, have become a significant part of our food supply. But how are GM foods made? This article delves into the processes behind genetic modification, exploring the techniques used and the regulations governing them.

Understanding Genetic Modification

A genetically modified organism (GMO) is one whose genetic material has been altered through the addition of a gene that expresses a desirable trait. This process, often referred to as “gene splicing,” aims to enhance the organism’s qualities, such as improving nutritional content, providing herbicide resistance, or protecting against pests. The ultimate goal is to create crops that are more beneficial for both producers and consumers.

The first GM food approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was the Flavr Savr Tomato in 1994. This tomato contained a gene that prevented cell wall breakdown, extending its shelf life. While deemed safe, it was later removed from the market due to consumer concerns. Today, the most common genetically engineered crops in the United States are cotton, corn, and soybeans, with 80–95% of these crops being genetically modified for insect resistance or herbicide tolerance.

Methods of Genetic Modification: How GM Foods Are Made

There are several methods scientists use to genetically modify crops and organisms for food:

1. Selective Breeding

Selective breeding is the oldest form of genetic modification. It involves breeding two strains of crops or organisms with desired traits to produce offspring that combine those traits. This method has been used for thousands of years and affects a large number of genes, ranging from 10,000 to 300,000. While effective, selective breeding is not typically considered when discussing GM foods in the modern context.

2. Mutagenesis

Mutagenesis is a technique applied only to crops. It involves exposing crop seeds to chemicals or radiation to induce rapid mutations. The mutations are random, and researchers observe the resulting crops, selecting those with desired traits for further breeding while discarding the rest. The number of genes impacted by mutagenesis is unknown. Similar to selective breeding, it’s generally excluded from discussions about modern GM foods.

3. RNA Interference (RNAi)

RNA interference (RNAi) is a modern GM technique that silences genes responsible for undesirable traits. By targeting and silencing specific genes, RNAi removes unwanted characteristics from the crop or organism. This method typically affects only one or two genes.

4. Transgenics

Transgenics involves inserting a gene from one species into a specific genetic location in another crop or organism. This introduces a desired trait that the recipient would not otherwise possess. Transgenics usually impacts only one to four genes.

Regulation of GM Foods

In the United States, GM foods are regulated by three federal agencies:

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA): Ensures the safety of GMOs related to plant health through the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Developers of GM crops must obtain a permit, addressing potential risks and environmental spread.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Regulates GMOs containing pesticides as part of their genetic makeup. The EPA sets safe pesticide levels and requires manufacturers to assess the short- and long-term impacts on humans, livestock, and the environment.
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Regulates the safety of all GM crops consumed by humans or animals. The FDA’s 1992 policy defined most GM crops as “substantially equivalent” to non-modified crops, classifying GM foods as “generally recognized as safe.” The FDA evaluates the safety and nutritional characteristics of GM crops through its voluntary Plant Biotechnology Consultation Program.

Benefits of GM Foods

GM crops have the potential to reduce production costs by decreasing the need for chemical and mechanical inputs. A meta-analysis of corn, maize, and cotton production studies showed a 21% increase in crop yields for those using GM technology and an average profit gain of 69% for GM-adopting farmers, particularly in developing countries.

GM technology can also enhance the nutritional value of plants. For example, soybean oil high in omega-3 fatty acids and “golden rice” containing beta-carotene and iron are examples of GM products aimed at improving nutrition. Other consultations include GM apples and potatoes with decreased browning and lower acrylamide formation when heated.

Health Concerns and Safety

Despite scientific consensus on the safety of GM foods, public concern remains. A common concern is the risk of allergic reactions, stemming from the potential transfer of allergenic proteins. The FDA addresses this by requiring evidence that no allergenic substances have been introduced into GM foods. If such evidence is lacking, the FDA mandates labeling to alert consumers.

Another concern involves gene transfer from GM foods to human cells. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) considers the risk of this occurring and negatively impacting human health to be very low.

Conclusion

Understanding How Gm Foods Are Made is crucial for informed decision-making. Genetic modification techniques like RNA interference and transgenics offer potential benefits, from increased crop yields to enhanced nutritional value. While concerns about safety and labeling persist, regulatory frameworks are in place to assess and manage potential risks. As research continues and our understanding of GM foods deepens, consumers can make well-informed choices about their consumption.

References

  • Addady M. 2016. President Obama signed this GMO labeling bill. Fortune. fortune.com/2016/07/31/gmo-labeling-bill
  • Agrawal, N., Dasaradhi, P.V.N., Mohmmed, A., Malhotra, P., Bhatnagar, R.K., and S.K. Mukherjee. 2003. RNA interference: biology, mechanism, and applications. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67(4), 657–685.
  • Bruening, G., and J.M. Lyons. 2000. “The Case of the FLAVR SAVR Tomato.” Calif. Agric. 54(4): 6–7.
  • Enserink, M. 2008. “Tough Lessons from Golden Rice.” Science. 320(5875): 468–71.
  • EPA. 2016. EPA’s Regulation of Biotechnology for Use in Pest Management. epa.gov/regulation-biotechnology-under-tsca-and-fifra/epas-regulation-biotechnology-use-pest-management
  • FDA. 1992. Statement of Policy—Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties: Guidance to Industry for Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties. fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/statement-policy-foods-derived-new-plant-varieties
  • FDA. 2015. Food Allergies: What You Need to Know. fda.gov/food/buy-store-serve-safe-food/food-allergies-what-you-need-know
  • FDA. 2015. Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Derived from Genetically Engineered Plants. fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm059098.htm
  • FDA. 2015. How FDA Regulates Food from Genetically Engineered Plants.
  • FDA. 2018. Final Biotechnology Consultations. Washington, D.C. fda.gov/food/consultation-programs-food-new-plant-varieties/final-biotechnology-consultationss
  • Funk, C., and L. Raine. 2015. Public and Scientists’ Views on Science and Society. Pew Research Center. researchgate.net/publication/279513537_Public_and_Scientists’_Views_on_Science_and_Society
  • Klümper, W., and Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS One, 9(11), e111629.
  • McEvoy, M. 2013. Organic 101: Can GMOs Be Used in Organic Products? U.S. Department of Agriculture. usda.gov/media/blog/2013/05/17/organic-101-can-gmos-be-used-organic-products
  • McHughen, A., and Smyth, S. 2008. U.S. regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotech. J., 6(1), 2–12.
  • Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., and Rosellini, D. 2014. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit. Rev. Biotech., 34(1), 77–88.
  • Non-GMO Project. 2016. nongmoproject.org
  • Osteen, C., Gottlieb, J., and U. Vasavada. 2012. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. USDA Economic Research Service. Washington, D.C. EIB–98. ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=44691
  • Rangel, G. 2015. From Corgis to Corn: A Brief Look at the Long History of GMO Technology. Harvard University.
  • Sherman, J.H., Choudhuri, S., and J.L. Vicini. 2015. Transgenic proteins in agricultural biotechnology: The toxicology forum 40th annual summer meeting. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 73(3), 811–818.
  • USDA. 2015. Recent Trends in GE Adoption. ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-u-s/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption/
  • USDA. 2016. Regulations. aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology
  • World Health Organization. 2014. Frequently Asked Questions on Genetically Modified Foods. who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/food-genetically-modified
  • World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Genetically Modified Microorganisms. Geneva, Switzerland. fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agns/pdf/topics/ec_sept2001.pdf

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *