Should Junk Food Be Banned in Schools? Exploring the Debate

Should Junk Food Be Banned In Schools? FOODS.EDU.VN delves into the heart of this critical debate, analyzing the impact of competitive foods on children’s health and well-being. Discover the truth about school food policies and their effect on students’ dietary choices, with practical solutions to promote healthier eating habits, find nutrition guidelines and wellness policy.

1. The Great Junk Food Debate: Examining the Core Issue

The question of whether to ban junk food in schools has ignited passionate debate among parents, educators, and health professionals. The discussion revolves around competitive foods – those tempting treats available outside of official school meal programs. These readily accessible snacks and beverages, often high in sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, spark concerns about their impact on students’ health. This part will dive into the center of the problem, carefully consider arguments from all sides.

1.1. The Rising Tide of Childhood Obesity

Childhood obesity has become a major public health concern, with rates steadily increasing over the past decades. Ogden et al. (2008) report that nearly one-third of children and adolescents in the U.S. are now considered overweight or obese. This alarming trend has serious long-term health consequences, including an increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, and certain types of cancer. The availability of junk food in schools is often cited as a contributing factor to this crisis.

1.2. Defining “Junk Food”: A Complex Challenge

Defining exactly what constitutes “junk food” can be surprisingly challenging. While the term generally refers to foods and beverages with limited nutritional value and high levels of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, there is no universally accepted definition. This ambiguity can make it difficult to establish clear and consistent policies regarding competitive foods in schools.

1.3. The Argument Against Junk Food: Health and Well-being

Opponents of junk food in schools argue that these foods contribute to poor dietary habits, weight gain, and an increased risk of chronic diseases. They point to studies showing that competitive foods are often higher in fat and sugar compared to school meal programs (Gordon et al. 2007b, Harnack et al. 2000, Story, Hayes & Kalina 1996). Critics also worry that easy access to junk food undermines efforts to teach children about healthy eating and nutrition.

1.4. The Argument for Competitive Foods: Funding and Choice

Supporters of competitive foods argue that these sales generate essential revenue for schools, especially during times of budget constraints (Gordon et al. 2007a). They maintain that restricting access to these foods would limit students’ choices and could lead to decreased funding for valuable school programs. Some also argue that schools should focus on educating students about making informed food choices rather than simply banning certain items.

1.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Perspective: A Balanced Approach

FOODS.EDU.VN believes that the key to resolving the junk food debate lies in finding a balanced approach that prioritizes student health while recognizing the financial realities faced by many schools. This includes exploring alternative funding sources, promoting healthier competitive food options, and implementing comprehensive nutrition education programs.

2. The School Food Environment: Understanding the Landscape

To effectively address the issue of junk food in schools, it’s important to understand the current food environment. This section examines the availability of competitive foods, the revenue they generate, and the existing regulations governing school food policies. We’ll show you how food availability affects student choices and consumption habits.

2.1. Competitive Foods: A Ubiquitous Presence

Competitive foods are widely available in schools across the country, though the specific types and quantities vary significantly. A la carte lines, vending machines, school stores, and fundraising activities are common sources of these foods. Studies show that high schools and middle schools are more likely to have vending machines than elementary schools (Gordon et al. 2007a).

2.2. The Revenue Factor: A Source of Funding

Sales of competitive foods can generate significant revenue for schools, providing much-needed funds for various programs and activities. Gordon et al. (2007a) found that middle and high schools earned an average of $10,850 and $15,233, respectively, from a la carte sales alone during 2005-2006. Vending machines and pouring contracts with beverage companies can further supplement these revenues.

2.3. The Regulatory Maze: Federal, State, and Local Policies

The regulation of competitive foods in schools is a complex mix of federal, state, and local policies. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulations have historically been limited, but recent years have seen increased efforts to establish stricter nutritional standards. Many states, districts, and individual schools have implemented their own policies to address the availability and quality of competitive foods (Boehmer et al. 2007).

2.4. The Influence of Food Policies: A Patchwork of Regulations

School food policies, like the “wellness policy” mandated by federal legislation in 2004, aim to establish nutrition guidelines for all foods available in schools. These policies can influence the types of competitive foods offered, potentially promoting healthier choices. However, the effectiveness of these policies varies widely depending on implementation and enforcement.

2.5. FOODS.EDU.VN Resources: Navigating School Food Policies

FOODS.EDU.VN offers valuable resources for navigating the complex landscape of school food policies. We provide information on federal regulations, state initiatives, and best practices for implementing healthy school food environments.

3. Research Insights: Analyzing the Evidence

Research on the impact of junk food availability in schools on children’s health is ongoing. While some studies have shown a link between competitive foods and poor dietary choices, others have found limited evidence of a direct effect on weight gain. We’ll look into what factors affect research results, and how to use them to improve your life.

3.1. Competitive Foods and Dietary Quality: A Clear Connection

Studies consistently show that competitive food availability is associated with a decline in the nutritional quality of meals consumed at school (Cullen et al. 2000, Cullen & Zakeri 2004; Templeton, Marlette & Panemangalore 2005). When junk food is readily available, children tend to choose these less nutritious options over healthier alternatives.

3.2. The Impact on Overall Diet: A More Complex Picture

The effects of competitive foods on overall diet quality (consumed both in and out of school) are less clear. Some research suggests that children may compensate for increased junk food intake at school by eating healthier foods at home. However, other studies have found little evidence of such compensatory behavior.

3.3. Junk Food and Weight Gain: Conflicting Findings

The link between junk food availability in schools and children’s weight is a subject of ongoing debate. Some studies have found a positive association between competitive foods and BMI (Anderson and Butcher 2006), while others have found little or no significant effect (Datar and Nicosia 2009). These conflicting findings may be due to differences in study design, sample populations, and methods of measuring food intake and BMI.

3.4. Addressing Endogeneity: A Methodological Challenge

One of the key challenges in researching the impact of junk food in schools is addressing the endogeneity of the school food environment. Schools that offer high-fat, energy-dense junk foods may differ on many observable and unobservable factors that are correlated with children’s weight and dietary behavior. Researchers use various statistical techniques, such as instrumental variables, to address this challenge (Anderson and Butcher 2006, Datar and Nicosia 2009).

3.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Analysis: Interpreting the Research

FOODS.EDU.VN provides in-depth analysis of the latest research on junk food in schools. We help you interpret the findings, understand the limitations of different studies, and draw informed conclusions about the impact of competitive foods on children’s health.

4. A Deeper Dive: Unpacking a Research Study

Let’s take a closer look at the study “Junk Food in Schools and Childhood Obesity: What Difference Does Availability Make?” by Datar and Nicosia (2009). This research used longitudinal data and an instrumental variables approach to examine the causal effect of junk food availability on children’s food consumption and BMI. We’ll use clear language to summarize, analyze, and explain everything from data to conclusions.

4.1. The ECLS-K Data: A Rich Source of Information

The study utilized data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Kindergarten Class (ECLS-K), a panel dataset on a nationally representative cohort of kindergarteners in the U.S. The ECLS-K collected information on children’s cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development, as well as their home, classroom, and school environments.

4.2. Measuring Junk Food Availability: Administrator Reports and Child Reports

The researchers used two primary measures of junk food availability in schools: reports from school administrators and reports from children themselves. School administrators were asked whether students could purchase various food and beverage items containing high sodium and/or sugar during school hours. Children were asked about their purchases of sweets, salty snack foods, and sweetened beverages during the previous week.

4.3. The Instrumental Variables Approach: Leveraging Grade Span

To address the potential endogeneity of junk food availability, the researchers used an instrumental variables (IV) approach. They leveraged the fact that junk foods are significantly more prevalent in middle and high schools compared to elementary schools (Finkelstein, Hill and Whitaker 2008). They used the school’s grade span as an instrument, arguing that a fifth grader attending a combined school is more likely to be exposed to junk foods compared to a fifth grader in an elementary school.

4.4. Key Findings: Limited Impact on BMI and Obesity

The study found that junk food availability had small positive associations with BMI and obesity in basic OLS models, but those associations became insignificant when controls for BMI at school entry and state fixed effects were added. The IV models generated somewhat larger, albeit less precise, point estimates that were also not statistically significant. Reduced form estimates, which are more precisely estimated than IV estimates, provided further support, showing that combined school attendance had no significant effects on 5th graders’ BMI and obesity.

4.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Interpretation: A Nuanced View

FOODS.EDU.VN interprets the findings of this study as suggesting that the impact of junk food availability on children’s BMI and obesity may be more nuanced than previously thought. While competitive foods may contribute to poor dietary choices, other factors, such as baseline BMI, state-level policies, and individual behaviors, may play a more significant role in determining weight outcomes.

5. Practical Solutions: Building a Healthier School Food Environment

Even if junk food availability doesn’t directly cause weight gain, creating healthier school food environments is still a worthy goal. This section explores practical strategies for schools, parents, and students to promote nutritious eating habits and overall well-being. Here are ways to promote a healthy lifestyle through simple, effective changes.

5.1. Promoting Healthier Competitive Food Options

Schools can replace traditional junk food items with healthier alternatives, such as fruits, vegetables, whole-grain snacks, and low-fat dairy products. Vending machines can be stocked with bottled water, unsweetened iced tea, and other nutritious beverages. A la carte lines can offer salads, wraps, and other healthy meal options.

5.2. Implementing Nutrition Education Programs

Comprehensive nutrition education programs can teach students about the importance of healthy eating, how to make informed food choices, and how to balance their diets. These programs can be integrated into the curriculum, offered as extracurricular activities, or presented as workshops for parents and teachers.

5.3. Enhancing School Meal Programs

Schools can enhance their meal programs by offering a wider variety of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. They can also reduce the levels of sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats in school meals. Involving students and parents in menu planning can help ensure that school meals are both nutritious and appealing.

5.4. Creating Supportive School Policies

Schools can implement policies that support healthy eating, such as limiting the availability of junk food during school hours, promoting healthy fundraising activities, and encouraging physical activity. These policies should be developed in collaboration with students, parents, teachers, and community stakeholders.

5.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Resources: Recipes, Tips, and Guidance

FOODS.EDU.VN provides a wealth of resources to help schools, parents, and students create healthier food environments. We offer nutritious recipes, practical tips for meal planning, and expert guidance on implementing effective school food policies.

6. The Broader Context: Society, Culture, and Habits

It’s essential to recognize that the issue of junk food in schools is just one piece of the puzzle. Societal factors, cultural norms, and individual habits all play a significant role in shaping children’s eating behaviors and overall health. We must consider a world of interconnected influences that promote or inhibit healthy habits.

6.1. The Influence of Food Marketing

Children are constantly bombarded with advertisements for junk food and sugary beverages. These marketing messages can influence their food preferences and choices, making it more difficult to promote healthy eating habits. Efforts to counter these marketing influences, such as public awareness campaigns and restrictions on advertising to children, can be effective.

6.2. The Role of Parental Influence

Parents play a crucial role in shaping their children’s eating habits. By modeling healthy eating behaviors, providing nutritious meals and snacks, and limiting access to junk food at home, parents can significantly influence their children’s food choices.

6.3. The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors

Socioeconomic factors, such as income and access to healthy food, can also influence children’s eating habits and health outcomes. Children from low-income families may have limited access to fresh fruits, vegetables, and other nutritious foods, making it more difficult for them to maintain a healthy diet.

6.4. The Importance of Physical Activity

In addition to healthy eating, regular physical activity is essential for maintaining a healthy weight and overall well-being. Schools can promote physical activity by offering physical education classes, recess, and extracurricular sports programs. Parents can encourage their children to be active by participating in sports, playing outdoors, and limiting screen time.

6.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Vision: A Holistic Approach

FOODS.EDU.VN advocates for a holistic approach to promoting children’s health that addresses not only the school food environment but also societal factors, cultural norms, and individual habits. By working together, schools, parents, communities, and policymakers can create a healthier future for all children.

7. Counterpoints & Considerations: A Balanced Perspective

Exploring the other side of the “junk food” debate is essential for a balanced and complete understanding. While health concerns are vital, there are also economic, social, and logistical counterpoints to consider. What are those arguments, and how do we weigh them responsibly?

7.1. Economic Considerations: School Funding

For some schools, especially those in underfunded districts, the revenue generated from vending machines and snack bars is a crucial source of income. Banning these sales could lead to cuts in other essential programs or activities.

7.2. Student Choice and Autonomy

Some argue that banning certain foods infringes on students’ autonomy and ability to make their own choices. Instead of banning, the focus should be on educating students about making informed decisions.

7.3. Potential for Unintended Consequences

Bans can sometimes lead to unintended consequences, such as students seeking out unhealthy foods off-campus, which may be even worse than what’s offered at school.

7.4. Emphasis on Individual Responsibility

A counter-argument suggests that instead of focusing solely on what’s available at school, greater emphasis should be placed on individual responsibility, teaching children to make healthy choices regardless of their environment.

7.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Stance: Balanced Solutions

FOODS.EDU.VN believes it’s essential to acknowledge these counterpoints. Solutions should be balanced, considering economic realities, respecting student choice, and promoting individual responsibility alongside creating healthier environments.

8. Real-World Success Stories: Inspiring Examples

It can be heartening and motivating to look at schools and districts that have successfully transformed their food environments. What strategies did they use? What were the challenges, and how did they overcome them? We’ll highlight successful approaches for actionable inspiration.

8.1. Case Study 1: Farm-to-School Initiatives

Some schools have partnered with local farms to provide fresh, healthy produce for school meals and snacks. This not only improves the nutritional quality of the food but also supports local agriculture and teaches students about the origins of their food.

8.2. Case Study 2: Salad Bars in Schools

Installing salad bars in school cafeterias can increase students’ consumption of fruits and vegetables. Salad bars allow students to customize their salads and choose from a variety of healthy toppings.

8.3. Case Study 3: Student-Led Wellness Programs

Empowering students to take an active role in promoting health and wellness can be highly effective. Student-led wellness programs can organize healthy eating campaigns, conduct peer education sessions, and advocate for healthier school food policies.

8.4. Case Study 4: Successful Fundraising Alternatives

Schools can find alternative fundraising activities that don’t rely on selling junk food. Options include fun runs, book sales, car washes, and community events that promote health and well-being.

8.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Archive: A Hub for Innovation

FOODS.EDU.VN will continue to curate and share these real-world success stories, providing a hub for innovation and inspiration for schools, parents, and communities looking to create healthier food environments.

9. Junk Food Consumption: Total Amount of Selected Junk and Healthy Foods

Food Category	Did Not Consume (%)	1-3 Times/Week (%)	4-6 Times/Week (%)	1 Time/Day (%)	2 Times/Day (%)	3 Times/Day (%)	4+ Times/Day (%)
Soda	15.5	37.9	16.9	11.5	7.8	3.7	6.7
Fast Food	28.6	51.3	9.9	5.4	2.0	0.8	2.1
Milk	10.9	17.3	16.0	14.0	16.4	11.4	13.9
Juice	23.9	34.9	14.6	10.9	7.3	3.7	4.8
Green Salad	48.6	33.1	7.4	6.9	2.1	0.7	1.2
Potatoes (ex. fries)	47.1	40.3	5.0	5.0	1.5	0.5	0.7
Carrots	45.3	32.3	9.9	5.8	2.5	1.4	2.7
Other Vegetables	17.7	36.1	20.4	12.6	6.6	2.9	3.7
Fruits	9.1	29.8	22.4	13.2	11.1	6.1	8.4

9.1. Examining Food Consumption Patterns

This table shows the consumption frequency of various food items among a sample of children. It categorizes consumption into different frequency ranges over a week. This information can be valuable for understanding overall dietary habits and identifying areas for improvement in nutrition.

9.2. Key Observations

Junk Food: A significant percentage of children consume soda and fast food at least once a week, indicating that these items are fairly integrated into their diets.
Healthy Foods: While many children consume fruits, vegetables, and milk regularly, a substantial portion does not consume green salads or potatoes (excluding fries) very often.
Daily Consumption: A smaller percentage of children consume any of these items multiple times per day, which suggests that while occasional consumption is common, constant daily intake is less prevalent.

9.3. What Can This Tell Us?

These consumption patterns can inform strategies for promoting healthier eating habits. Efforts can be directed towards increasing the consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole foods, while also addressing the intake of sugary drinks and fast food. Nutritional education and accessible healthy options in schools and homes can play a crucial role in shaping these patterns.

9.4. FOODS.EDU.VN Insights

For further insights, visit FOODS.EDU.VN, where we provide extensive resources on promoting healthy eating habits, offering balanced nutritional advice, and sharing tips for incorporating more fruits and vegetables into your diet. Discover how to make small, sustainable changes for long-term health and well-being.

10. Future Directions: The Ongoing Journey

The journey to understanding the role of junk food in schools and its impact on children’s health is an ongoing one. What are the key areas for future research? What are the emerging trends and policy considerations? We’ll discuss ways to better support student health through school nutrition.

10.1. Longitudinal Studies

More longitudinal studies are needed to track the long-term effects of school food environments on children’s weight, dietary habits, and overall health. These studies should account for a wide range of factors, including individual behaviors, family influences, and community resources.

10.2. Qualitative Research

Qualitative research methods, such as focus groups and interviews, can provide valuable insights into the lived experiences of students, parents, and school staff. This research can help us understand the social, cultural, and emotional factors that influence food choices in schools.

10.3. Policy Evaluations

Rigorous evaluations of school food policies are needed to determine their effectiveness in promoting healthy eating and reducing childhood obesity. These evaluations should assess not only the impact on student health but also the economic and social consequences of these policies.

10.4. Innovative Interventions

Innovative interventions that combine nutrition education, behavioral strategies, and environmental changes are needed to promote sustainable healthy eating habits in schools. These interventions should be tailored to the specific needs and preferences of different student populations.

10.5. FOODS.EDU.VN’s Commitment: Guiding the Way

foods.edu.vn remains committed to providing the latest research, practical guidance, and innovative solutions to support schools, parents, and communities in creating healthier food environments for all children. Together, we can pave the way for a healthier future.

FAQ: Junk Food in Schools

Here are some frequently asked questions about the impact of junk food in schools:

What are “competitive foods” in the context of school nutrition?
- Competitive foods are foods and beverages sold in schools outside of the federally-reimbursable school meal programs, such as those available in vending machines, school stores, and a la carte lines.
Why is there a debate about banning junk food in schools?
- The debate arises due to concerns about the contribution of junk food to childhood obesity and poor dietary habits, versus the revenue that these sales provide to schools.
What are the main arguments against having junk food available in schools?
- Arguments include the potential for these foods to contribute to weight gain, poor dietary habits, and long-term health issues, as well as undermining nutrition education efforts.
What are the main arguments for allowing competitive foods in schools?
- Supporters argue that these sales generate crucial revenue for schools and that students should have the autonomy to make their own food choices.
What kind of impact does junk food availability have on the nutritional quality of meals consumed at school?
- Studies show that competitive food availability often leads to a decline in the nutritional quality of meals consumed at school, as students tend to choose less nutritious options over healthier alternatives.
How do school food policies influence what competitive foods are offered to students?
- School food policies, such as wellness policies, aim to set nutrition guidelines for all foods available, which can influence the types of competitive foods offered, potentially promoting healthier choices.
Are there specific research findings on the link between junk food availability in schools and children’s BMI?
- Research findings are mixed, with some studies showing a positive association between competitive foods and BMI, while others find little or no significant effect.
What are some practical strategies for schools to promote a healthier food environment?
- Strategies include offering healthier competitive food options, implementing nutrition education programs, enhancing school meal programs, and creating supportive school policies.
What are some successful examples of schools transforming their food environments?
- Examples include farm-to-school initiatives, installing salad bars in schools, and empowering students to take an active role in promoting health and wellness.
Besides school policies, what broader factors influence children’s eating behaviors and overall health?
- Societal factors, cultural norms, parental influence, socioeconomic factors, and the promotion of physical activity all play a significant role in shaping children’s eating behaviors and overall health.

References

Anderson and Butcher 2006: Anderson, P. M., & Butcher, K. F. (2006). Reading, Writing, and Raisin Bran: How School Nutrition Programs Improve Academic Performance. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Anderson and Matsa 2011: Anderson, M. L., & Matsa, D. A. (2011). Are Restaurant Meals Substitutes for or Complements to Home Meals? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(3), 692–713.
Angrist and Krueger 2001: Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001). Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 69–85.
Bedard and Do 2005: Bedard, K., & Do, C. (2005). The Formation of Dropping Out: The Role of School Organization. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(3), 747–772.
Black 2007: Black, R. (2007). Lawmakers aim to fatten school lunches. Boston Globe.
Boehmer et al 2007: Boehmer, T. K., Brownson, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., & Drewnowski, A. (2007). State legislative efforts to combat obesity, 2003–2006. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), A65.
Briefel et al 2009: Briefel, R. R., Wilson, A., Gleason, P. M., & Caplan, W. (2009). The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study-III: Study Design, Data Collection, and Analytic Methods. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(2), S6–S16.
Case and Katz 1991: Case, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (1991). The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chernozhukov and Hansen 2008: Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2008). The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments. Economics Letters, 100(3), 348–351.
Clark and Folk 2007: Clark, D. E., & Folk, K. F. (2007). Organizational Structure, Peer Affiliation, and Adolescent Substance Use. Sociology of Education, 80(2), 145–166.
Clark and Loheac 2007: Clark, D. E., & Loheac, Y. (2007). School Sector, Peer Effects and Educational Achievement. Journal of Population Economics, 20(3), 629–654.
Cook et al 2008: Cook, P. J., Dodge, K. A., Gifford, E. J., & Simons, T. R. (2008). The (Surprising) Efficacy of Academic and Behavioral Interventions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(3), 206–231.
Crane 1991: Crane, J. (1991). Effects of Neighborhoods on Dropping Out of School and Teenage Childbearing. In The Urban Underclass (pp. 118–158). Brookings Institution Press.
Cullen et al 2000: Cullen, K. W., Epps, J. B., Markle, S., Baranowski, T., & Zakeri, I. (2000). Association Between A La Carte Food Choices and Diet Quality in Middle School Students. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100(12), 1479–1482.
Cullen & Zakeri 2004: Cullen, K. W., & Zakeri, I. (2004). Fruits, vegetables, milk, and sweetened beverages consumption and access to a la carte/snack bar meals at school. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 463–467.
Cullen et al 2001: Cullen, K. W., Baranowski, T., Rittenberry, L., Olvera, N., & Cossrow, N. (2001). Social-Environmental Influences on Children’s Diets: Results from Focus Groups with Fourth and Fifth Grade Students. Health Education Research, 16(5), 581–591.
Datar and Nicosia 2009: Datar, A. and Nicosia, N. (2009). Junk Food in Schools and Childhood Obesity: What Difference Does Availability Make?. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Eisenberg 2004: Eisenberg, M. E. (2004). Grade Span in Middle School and Adolescent Well-Being. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(3), 204–211.
Evans, Oates and Schwab 1992: Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1992). Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 966–991.
Fernandes 2008: Fernandes, M. (2008). The impact of schools on childhood obesity.
Finkelstein, Hill and Whitaker 2008: Finkelstein, D. M., Hill, E. L., & Whitaker, R. C. (2008). Preschool Children at High Risk for Obesity: Are Child Care Centers Part of the Problem? Obesity, 16(5), 1062–1068.
French et al 2004: French, S. A., Story, M., Jeffery, R. W., Snyder, P., Sidebottom, J., & Mohs, D. (2004). Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: The CHIPS Study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 493–496.
French et al 2001: French, S. A., Jeffery, R. W., Forster, J. L., McGovern, P. G., Snyder, P. M., & Hearst, N. (2001). A Pricing Strategy to Promote Low-Fat Snack Choices Through Vending Machines. American Journal of Public Health, 91(6), 847–849.
French et al 1997a: French, S. A., Story, M., Jeffery, R. W., Snyder, P., Eisenberg, M., Sidebottom, J., & Murray, D. (1997a). Pricing Strategy to Promote Fruit and Vegetable Purchases in Secondary Schools. American Journal of Public Health, 87(5), 848–851.
French et al 1997b: French, S. A., Story, M., Jeffery, R. W., Snyder, P., Eisenberg, M., Sidebottom, J., & Murray, D. (1997b). Environmental influences on eating and physical activity: Results of focus groups with adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(5), 358–365.
Gaviria and Raphael 2001: Gaviria, A., & Raphael, S. (2001). School-Based Peer Effects and Risky Behaviors among Adolescents. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–292.
Glaeser, Sacerdote, and Scheinkman 1996: Glaeser, E. L., Sacerdote, B., & Scheinkman, J. A. (1996). Crime and Social Interactions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 507–548.
Gordon et al 2007a: Gordon, A., Briefel, R., Wilson, A., & Gleason, P. (2007a). Availability of competitive foods in U.S. schools: Findings from the Third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(3 Suppl), S32–S43.
Gordon et al 2007b: Gordon, A., Demissie, Z., Wilson, A., Wolman, S., & Chee, E. (2007b). Competitive Foods Offered in Schools: Nutritional Content and Contribution to Student Diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(3 Suppl), S44–S55.
Hanushek et al 2003: Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does Peer Ability Affect Student Achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527–544.
Harnack et al 2000: Harnack, L., Snyder, P., Story, M., Holliday, A., & Jeffery, R. (2000). Availability of low-fat entrees and snacks in school vending machines. Preventive Medicine, 30(4),