Taste of the Wild dog food has gained popularity for its grain-free formulas and focus on natural ingredients, often appealing to dog owners seeking a diet that mirrors their pet’s ancestral eating habits. However, like any pet food brand, opinions and experiences can vary. This article delves into Taste Of The Wild Dog Food Reviews, examining what pet owners are saying and helping you determine if it remains a suitable option for your canine companion.
One dog owner’s recent experience highlights some potential shifts in the quality or consistency of Taste of the Wild, prompting a closer look at the brand. This pet owner, based in Australia, had been feeding their dog, Patch, Taste of the Wild Sierra Mountain Roasted Lamb formula for two years, with positive results for Patch’s Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). However, a recently purchased bag seemed different. The owner noted a change in smell and significantly smaller kibble size. Initially, smaller kibble was perceived as potentially beneficial for digestion, as Patch tends to swallow kibble whole.
Despite the initial optimism, Patch’s reaction to this new bag of Taste of the Wild was concerning. After consuming it, Patch began eating grass, a common sign of stomach upset in dogs, and exhibited general unwellness. This was in stark contrast to his usual behavior after eating other kibble or cooked meals. Initially attributing the change to stress from moving, the owner became more worried when Patch refused to eat the Taste of the Wild altogether – a rare occurrence for a dog with a usually healthy appetite, even when ill.
Prompt action was taken by the pet owner, who contacted Pet Circle, the retailer. Pet Circle, known for their excellent customer service, promptly refunded the purchase price and advised discarding the remaining food, suggesting it could be given to a rescue or friend if preferred, but ultimately recommending disposal. This experience raises questions about potential batch variations or changes in Taste of the Wild’s formula that might affect some dogs negatively.
Considering these concerns, it’s wise to explore alternative dog food options, particularly those made in countries with stringent quality control. Australian-made and owned brands like “Meals For Mutts” (MfM) and “Ivory Coat” are worth considering. “Ivory Coat,” while recently acquired by a Chinese company, maintains its Australian production. Its Kangaroo and Lamb formulas are particularly appealing to dogs, with kangaroo being a rich and flavorful meat source. It’s important to note the distinction between “Kangaroo Meal” in Australian products and “Wild Kangaroo” sometimes seen in American formulas, where the latter may be less pure and supplemented with fillers like lentils to boost protein percentages.
“Canidae” is another reputable brand, American-made but with a focus on quality ingredients, including sourcing vegetables from local farmers, similar to some Australian brands. Their “Canidae Pure” and “Canidae All Life Stages” formulas are well-regarded. For senior dogs, “Canidae Pure Meadow” Senior formula is specifically designed to support aging canines. Anecdotal evidence suggests significant improvements in older dogs’ health and vitality after switching to this formula from cheaper supermarket brands.
“Nutro” also offers grain-free and “Frontier” formulas made in Australia, presenting another viable alternative. In the original account, the dog owner successfully transitioned to “Nutro Essential” as a temporary solution when Patch refused Taste of the Wild, with positive results. The owner also planned to try “Meals For Mutts” CN Vital Health Hypoallergenic Holistic Remedy Diet Turkey & Veggies, further demonstrating a proactive approach to finding a suitable food.
Beyond individual experiences, it’s crucial to be aware of broader quality and safety concerns within the pet food industry. Reports have surfaced regarding contaminates and toxins found in various pet food brands. While specific brand names and links might be restricted in certain contexts, a general online search for “toxins in pet foods” can reveal relevant information and testing results. Some reports from 2017 indicated that certain Taste of the Wild formulas, such as Pacific Stream Smoked Salmon and High Prairie, were found to have higher levels of toxins compared to brands like Canidae and Under The Sun, which performed better in testing. It is advisable to seek out reputable pet food review sites, such as the Australian “Pet Food Review” site mentioned in the original text, which may provide information on pet food quality and safety testing.
In conclusion, while Taste of the Wild has been a popular choice for many dog owners, recent experiences and broader industry concerns suggest a need for careful consideration. Individual dog reactions can vary, and potential inconsistencies in product quality may occur. Exploring high-quality alternatives, particularly those made in Australia or brands with strong quality control reputations, is a prudent step for any dog owner. Continuously monitoring your dog’s health and being informed about pet food quality are essential aspects of responsible pet ownership. Always consult with your veterinarian for personalized dietary advice for your dog.
